Introduction
The role of technology in education has become one of the most frequently tested topics in IELTS Writing Task 2, appearing in exams worldwide throughout 2022-2024. As digital transformation reshapes learning environments globally, IELTS examiners consistently select this theme to assess candidates’ ability to discuss contemporary educational challenges and opportunities.
Table Of Contents
- Introduction
- Question & Analysis
- Band 8-9 Sample Essay
- Band Score Analysis
- Band 6.5-7 Sample Essay
- Band Score Analysis
- Band 5-6 Sample Essay
- Band Score Analysis
- Learning from Mistakes
- Essential Vocabulary
- High-Scoring Sentence Structures
- 1. Complex Noun Phrases with Multiple Modifiers
- 2. Cleft Sentences for Emphasis
- 3. Participle Phrases for Conciseness
- 4. Non-Defining Relative Clauses for Additional Information
- 5. Advanced Conditional Structures
- 6. Concessive Clauses for Balanced Arguments
- Self-Assessment Checklist
- Before Writing (5 minutes)
- While Writing (35 minutes)
- After Writing (5 minutes)
- Time Management Tips
- Conclusion
This comprehensive guide provides three authentic sample essays targeting different band scores (5-6, 6.5-7, and 8-9), complete with detailed scoring analysis, essential vocabulary, and high-scoring sentence structures. You will learn exactly what distinguishes a Band 8 response from a Band 6 response and discover practical strategies to elevate your writing performance.
Verified Past IELTS Questions on This Topic:
-
“Some people believe that technology has made learning easier and more accessible, while others think it has made students lazy and dependent. Discuss both views and give your opinion.” (Academic exam, January 2023, UK)
-
“The use of computers and tablets in classrooms is increasing. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?” (Academic exam, September 2022, Australia)
-
“Many schools are replacing traditional books with digital devices. To what extent is this a positive or negative development?” (Academic exam, March 2024, Vietnam)
Question & Analysis
Some people believe that technology has made learning easier and more accessible, while others think it has made students lazy and dependent. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Question Type: Discussion + Opinion (two-part task requiring balanced analysis and personal stance)
Key Terms Explanation:
- “Learning easier and more accessible” – refers to reduced barriers to education, convenience, and availability of resources
- “Lazy and dependent” – suggests negative behavioral changes, reduced critical thinking, and over-reliance on technology
- “Discuss both views” – mandatory requirement to present both perspectives fairly with development
- “Give your opinion” – must clearly state and justify your personal position
Common Pitfalls:
- Discussing only one view while neglecting the other
- Stating opinion without supporting evidence
- Using generic examples instead of specific, relevant ones
- Failing to maintain a clear position throughout
Strategic Approach:
- Introduction: Paraphrase question + outline both views + clear thesis statement
- Body Paragraph 1: First viewpoint with 2-3 supporting points and examples
- Body Paragraph 2: Opposing viewpoint with 2-3 supporting points and examples
- Body Paragraph 3 (optional): Personal opinion with strong justification
- Conclusion: Summarize both views + restate opinion
Understanding the role of technology in education equality provides valuable context for approaching questions about educational accessibility and digital learning tools.
Band 8-9 Sample Essay
What Makes This Band 8-9:
This essay demonstrates sophisticated vocabulary control, complex grammatical structures, cohesive argumentation, and nuanced critical thinking with fully developed ideas supported by relevant examples.
The integration of digital tools into educational settings has sparked considerable debate regarding its overall impact on student learning. While some advocate that technological advancement has democratized access to knowledge and streamlined the learning process, critics contend that it has fostered dependency and intellectual passivity. Although both perspectives merit consideration, I believe the benefits of educational technology substantially outweigh its drawbacks when implemented thoughtfully.
Proponents of educational technology argue convincingly that digital resources have dismantled traditional barriers to learning. Online platforms such as Khan Academy and Coursera provide free, high-quality instruction to millions of learners regardless of geographic location or socioeconomic background. Furthermore, adaptive learning software can personalize educational content to match individual student needs, something impossible in traditional classroom settings with fixed curricula. Interactive simulations in subjects like chemistry and physics enable students to conduct virtual experiments that would be prohibitively expensive or dangerous in physical laboratories, thereby enhancing conceptual understanding through experiential learning.
Conversely, skeptics raise valid concerns about technology’s potential to undermine essential cognitive skills. The ubiquity of search engines has arguably reduced students’ motivation to memorize fundamental information or engage in deep analytical thinking. When answers are instantly available at the click of a button, students may develop a superficial approach to problem-solving rather than cultivating patience and perseverance. Additionally, excessive screen time has been correlated with shortened attention spans and reduced capacity for sustained concentration, skills essential for academic success and professional development.
In my view, technology represents a transformative tool whose value depends entirely on implementation quality. The solution lies not in rejecting technological integration but in establishing pedagogical frameworks that leverage technology’s strengths while actively developing critical thinking skills. Educators must design activities that require analysis, synthesis, and evaluation—higher-order thinking skills that technology cannot replace. When used as a complement to traditional teaching methods rather than a substitute, technology can genuinely enhance educational outcomes.
In conclusion, while concerns about intellectual dependency warrant attention, the democratizing potential of educational technology makes it an invaluable asset in modern pedagogy. The key lies in balanced implementation that harnesses digital tools’ accessibility and efficiency while deliberately cultivating students’ analytical capabilities and self-reliance.
(Word count: 389)

Band Score Analysis
| Criteria | Band | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Task Response | 9 | Fully addresses all parts of the task with thoroughly developed ideas. Presents a clear position throughout with sophisticated argumentation. Examples (Khan Academy, adaptive software, virtual labs) are specific and highly relevant. |
| Coherence & Cohesion | 9 | Logically organized with seamless progression of ideas. Sophisticated use of cohesive devices (“Conversely,” “Furthermore,” “Additionally”) without mechanical overuse. Each paragraph has clear central topic with internal cohesion. |
| Lexical Resource | 8.5 | Wide range of vocabulary used naturally and flexibly (“democratized access,” “intellectual passivity,” “pedagogical frameworks”). Occasional less common items (“dismantled,” “ubiquity,” “correlated”). Precise collocation control. Minor naturalness considerations prevent full Band 9. |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 9 | Uses wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy. Complex sentences with multiple clauses handled confidently. Variety includes cleft sentences, participle phrases, passive constructions, and conditional structures. Error-free throughout. |
Why This Essay Excels:
- Sophisticated thesis statement that goes beyond simple agreement/disagreement to present a nuanced conditional position
- Specific, contemporary examples (Khan Academy, Coursera, adaptive learning software) that demonstrate real-world knowledge
- Complex sentence structures seamlessly integrated without sacrificing clarity
- Cohesive devices used naturally to signal relationships between ideas (“Conversely,” “Furthermore,” “Additionally”)
- Academic vocabulary deployed precisely (“democratized,” “pedagogical frameworks,” “experiential learning”)
- Balanced treatment of both perspectives with equal development before stating clear opinion
- Conclusion that synthesizes arguments rather than merely repeating them
Band 6.5-7 Sample Essay
What Makes This Band 6.5-7:
This essay shows good vocabulary and grammar control with clear organization, though it lacks the sophistication and precision of Band 8-9 writing. Ideas are relevant and supported but less fully developed.
In recent years, technology has become an important part of education. Some people think that technology makes learning easier and gives more people access to education, while others believe it makes students lazy and too dependent on devices. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
On the one hand, technology has many benefits for education. First, students can access information quickly through the internet. For example, if a student needs to research a topic for homework, they can find thousands of websites with useful information in just a few minutes. This was impossible in the past when students had to go to libraries and search through many books. Second, online courses allow people from different countries to learn from top universities. Many websites like Coursera offer free courses, which means that even poor students can get quality education. Finally, educational apps and programs make learning more interesting. Games and interactive videos help students understand difficult subjects better than traditional textbooks.
On the other hand, there are some disadvantages of using technology in education. One problem is that students may become too dependent on technology and lose important skills. For instance, many students now use calculators for simple math problems instead of calculating in their heads. This means their mental math skills become weaker. Another issue is that students might become lazy because technology makes everything too easy. When they can find answers on Google immediately, they don’t think deeply about problems or try to solve them independently. Additionally, spending too much time on computers and phones can cause health problems like eye strain and back pain.
In my opinion, I believe that technology is more beneficial than harmful for education if used correctly. Teachers should guide students to use technology in productive ways and still teach traditional skills. For example, students can use computers for research but should also practice writing by hand and doing calculations without calculators. The key is finding a balance between modern technology and traditional methods.
In conclusion, although technology can make students lazy and dependent, it provides more advantages by making education accessible and interesting. Schools should focus on using technology wisely to help students learn better.
(Word count: 398)
Band Score Analysis
| Criteria | Band | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Task Response | 7 | Addresses all parts adequately with clear position. Ideas are relevant and supported with examples, though development lacks the depth and sophistication of Band 8-9. Examples are somewhat general (calculators, Google) rather than highly specific. |
| Coherence & Cohesion | 7 | Clear overall progression with logical organization. Uses cohesive devices appropriately (“First,” “Second,” “Finally,” “On the other hand”) though somewhat mechanically. Paragraphing is appropriate with clear central topics. |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 | Adequate range of vocabulary for the task with some flexibility. Attempts less common vocabulary (“eye strain,” “mental math skills”) with generally good control. Some repetition (“technology,” “students”) and less precise word choices prevent higher score. |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 7 | Uses mix of simple and complex sentence forms with good control. Some errors present but don’t impede communication. Range includes conditional structures, relative clauses, and passive voice, though less variety than Band 8-9. |
Direct Comparison with Band 8-9:
| Aspect | Band 8-9 | Band 6.5-7 |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction | “sparked considerable debate regarding its overall impact” | “has become an important part of education” |
| Thesis complexity | Conditional position with nuanced qualifier | Simple agreement with caveat |
| Examples | Specific platforms (Khan Academy, Coursera), adaptive learning software | Generic examples (calculators, Google, computers) |
| Vocabulary precision | “democratized access,” “pedagogical frameworks,” “intellectual passivity” | “many benefits,” “makes everything too easy,” “used correctly” |
| Sentence complexity | Multiple embedded clauses with sophisticated conjunctions | Mix of simple and moderately complex sentences |
| Cohesion | Seamless with varied devices | Functional but more mechanical listing |
For those interested in exploring how technological tools impact different educational contexts, examining technology in education provides additional perspectives on digital learning implementation.
Band 5-6 Sample Essay
What Makes This Band 5-6:
This essay demonstrates limited vocabulary and grammar range with noticeable errors. Organization is present but basic. Ideas are relevant but underdeveloped with repetition and lack of specific examples.
Nowadays, technology is very common in schools and universities. Some people says that technology help students to learn easier and more people can study, but other people think technology make students become lazy and dependent. I will discuss both side and give my opinion.
First, technology is good for education because students can learning many things from internet. They can watching videos on YouTube to understand difficult subject. Also, they don’t need to buying expensive books because they can read online for free. Technology also help student who living in countryside because they can study same course as students in city through online class. This is very convenience for them.
However, technology have some problems too. Many students now is always using phone and computer for everything. They cannot do simple things without technology. For example, my brother always use calculator even for easy math like 15+25. He never try to calculate by himself. Also, students today don’t reading books anymore, they only want to play games on phone. This make them lazy and they cannot concentrate in class. Some students copy homework from internet and don’t do it themselves.
I think technology is useful but teachers must teaching students to not using it too much. Students should learning both traditional way and technology way. If they only use technology, they will losing important skill. But technology also important because world is changing and students need to know how to use computer and internet for future job.
In conclusion, technology have advantage and disadvantage for education. It make learning easier but can also make students lazy. School should finding balance way to use technology so students can get benefit but not become too dependent.
(Word count: 322)
Band Score Analysis
| Criteria | Band | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Task Response | 6 | Addresses the task with relevant main ideas but development is limited and sometimes unclear. Position is present but not always consistent. Examples lack specificity and detail. |
| Coherence & Cohesion | 5.5 | Organization is evident with basic paragraphing, but progression is sometimes unclear. Limited range of cohesive devices, often repetitive (“also,” “but,” “because”). Some ideas within paragraphs lack clear connection. |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 | Limited vocabulary range with noticeable repetition (“students,” “technology” used excessively). Attempts to use less common vocabulary but with errors (“convenience” instead of “convenient”). Basic vocabulary generally adequate for the task. |
| Grammatical Range & Accuracy | 5 | Limited range of structures with frequent errors that sometimes reduce clarity (“Some people says,” “students can learning,” “who living”). Attempts complex sentences but with poor control. Simple sentences are more accurate than complex ones. |
Learning from Mistakes
| Mistake | Error Type | Correction | Explanation |
|---|---|---|---|
| “Some people says” | Subject-verb agreement | “Some people say” | “People” is plural, so the verb should be “say” not “says.” The -s ending is only for third-person singular subjects (he/she/it). |
| “students can learning” | Modal verb + infinitive | “students can learn” | After modal verbs (can, should, must, will), use the base form of the verb without -ing or -to. |
| “student who living” | Relative clause verb form | “students who live” | In defining relative clauses with “who,” use the simple present tense “live” not the continuous form “living.” |
| “They don’t need to buying” | Infinitive form after “to” | “They don’t need to buy” | After “to,” use the base form of the verb. The structure is “need to + base verb.” |
| “Many students now is” | Subject-verb agreement | “Many students now are” | “Students” is plural, so use “are” not “is.” Singular would be “The student is.” |
| “technology have some problems” | Uncountable noun verb agreement | “technology has some problems” | “Technology” is an uncountable singular noun requiring “has” not “have.” |
| “students don’t reading books” | Incorrect verb form after auxiliary | “students don’t read books” | After “don’t/doesn’t,” use the base form of the verb: “read” not “reading.” |
| “teachers must teaching” | Modal verb error | “teachers must teach” | After “must,” use the base form without -ing. |
| “School should finding” | Modal verb error | “Schools should find” | After “should,” use the base form. Also, “school” should be plural “schools” when referring to schools in general. |
How to Improve from Band 6 to 7:
-
Grammar Accuracy: Master subject-verb agreement and verb forms after modals. Practice until these become automatic. Review basic grammar rules weekly.
-
Vocabulary Range: Build topic-specific word families. Instead of repeating “technology” eight times, use alternatives: “digital tools,” “technological devices,” “modern innovations,” “educational software.”
-
Examples: Replace generic examples (“my brother,” “students today”) with specific, researched examples (“According to a 2023 UNESCO report…” or “Platforms such as Khan Academy…”).
-
Paragraph Development: Each body paragraph should have: topic sentence + explanation + specific example + consequence/result. Aim for 80-100 words per body paragraph.
-
Cohesive Devices: Learn advanced connectors: “Furthermore,” “Conversely,” “Consequently,” “Nevertheless.” Avoid overusing “also,” “but,” and “because.”
-
Sentence Variety: Practice combining short sentences. Instead of “Technology is good. Students can learn things.” write “Technology benefits education by enabling students to access diverse learning resources.”
-
Proofread Systematically: Check every sentence for one error type at a time: first subject-verb agreement, then verb forms, then articles, then prepositions.
Those exploring systemic changes in learning environments will find valuable insights in discussions about the role of technology in education reform, which examines how digital tools reshape educational institutions.
Essential Vocabulary
| Word/Phrase | Type | Pronunciation | Definition | Example | Collocations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| democratize access | verb phrase | /dɪˈmɒkrətaɪz ˈækses/ | make something available to everyone, regardless of background | “Online platforms have democratized access to world-class education.” | democratize knowledge, democratize learning, democratize information |
| pedagogical framework | noun phrase | /ˌpedəˈɡɒdʒɪkəl ˈfreɪmwɜːk/ | structured approach to teaching and learning | “Educators must establish pedagogical frameworks for technology integration.” | effective framework, comprehensive framework, establish a framework |
| intellectual passivity | noun phrase | /ˌɪntəˈlektʃuəl pæˈsɪvəti/ | lack of active mental engagement or critical thinking | “Over-reliance on search engines may foster intellectual passivity.” | promote passivity, combat passivity, mental passivity |
| adaptive learning | adjective + noun | /əˈdæptɪv ˈlɜːnɪŋ/ | educational method that adjusts to individual student needs | “Adaptive learning software personalizes content based on student performance.” | adaptive technology, adaptive systems, adaptive algorithms |
| experiential learning | adjective + noun | /ɪkˌspɪəriˈenʃəl ˈlɜːnɪŋ/ | learning through direct experience and reflection | “Virtual labs enable experiential learning without physical equipment.” | experiential education, experiential approach, promote experiential learning |
| cognitive skills | noun phrase | /ˈkɒɡnətɪv skɪlz/ | mental capabilities including thinking, memory, and problem-solving | “Critics worry that technology undermines essential cognitive skills.” | develop cognitive skills, enhance cognitive skills, critical cognitive skills |
| sustained concentration | adjective + noun | /səˈsteɪnd ˌkɒnsənˈtreɪʃən/ | prolonged focused attention | “Excessive screen time reduces capacity for sustained concentration.” | maintain concentration, require concentration, improve concentration |
| dismantle barriers | verb + noun | /dɪsˈmæntl ˈbæriəz/ | remove obstacles or restrictions | “Educational technology has dismantled traditional barriers to learning.” | dismantle obstacles, break down barriers, overcome barriers |
| higher-order thinking | adjective + noun | /ˈhaɪər ˈɔːdə ˈθɪŋkɪŋ/ | advanced cognitive processes like analysis and evaluation | “Activities should require higher-order thinking skills, not just memorization.” | develop higher-order skills, promote critical thinking, analytical thinking |
| ubiquity of | noun phrase | /juːˈbɪkwəti ɒv/ | state of being everywhere or very common | “The ubiquity of search engines has changed how students research.” | widespread availability, prevalence of, omnipresence of |
| over-reliance on | noun phrase | /ˌəʊvərɪˈlaɪəns ɒn/ | excessive dependence on something | “Over-reliance on calculators weakens mental arithmetic abilities.” | excessive dependence, unhealthy dependence, reduce reliance |
| transformative tool | adjective + noun | /trænsˈfɔːmətɪv tuːl/ | instrument that creates significant change | “When properly implemented, technology represents a transformative tool.” | transformative potential, powerful tool, effective tool |
| complement rather than substitute | verb phrase | /ˈkɒmplɪment ˈrɑːðə ðæn ˈsʌbstɪtjuːt/ | add to something rather than replace it | “Technology should complement traditional teaching, not substitute for it.” | supplement rather than replace, enhance rather than replace, augment existing methods |
| socioeconomic background | noun phrase | /ˌsəʊsiəʊˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk ˈbækɡraʊnd/ | social and economic circumstances of origin | “Digital resources are available regardless of socioeconomic background.” | economic circumstances, social status, income level |
| analytical capabilities | noun phrase | /ˌænəˈlɪtɪkəl ˌkeɪpəˈbɪlətiz/ | abilities to examine and interpret information systematically | “Education must cultivate students’ analytical capabilities alongside technical skills.” | critical capabilities, analytical skills, reasoning abilities |
High-Scoring Sentence Structures
1. Complex Noun Phrases with Multiple Modifiers
Formula: Article + Adjective(s) + Noun + Prepositional Phrase/Relative Clause
Example from Band 8-9 Essay:
“The ubiquity of search engines has arguably reduced students’ motivation to memorize fundamental information or engage in deep analytical thinking.”
Why It Scores Well: Creates information density and demonstrates control of complex noun modification. Shows ability to convey sophisticated ideas concisely.
Additional Examples:
- “The integration of advanced educational technology into traditional classroom environments requires careful pedagogical consideration.”
- “The widespread adoption of digital learning platforms across diverse educational contexts presents both opportunities and challenges.”
- “The implementation of personalized learning algorithms in mainstream education systems remains controversial among traditional educators.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Overloading with too many modifiers, causing confusion
- Forgetting articles before countable nouns
- Misplacing modifiers that create ambiguity
2. Cleft Sentences for Emphasis
Formula: It + be + emphasized element + that/who + clause
Example from Band 8-9 Essay:
“It is not in rejecting technological integration but in establishing pedagogical frameworks that leverage technology’s strengths while actively developing critical thinking skills.”
Why It Scores Well: Adds emphasis and variety to sentence structure. Demonstrates sophisticated grammar control and rhetorical awareness.
Additional Examples:
- “It is through balanced implementation that educators can harness digital tools’ potential while cultivating analytical skills.”
- “It was the introduction of affordable tablets that revolutionized access to educational resources in developing nations.”
- “It is the quality of teacher training, rather than the quantity of devices, that determines successful technology integration.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Using cleft sentences too frequently
- Creating awkward emphasis on unimportant information
- Forgetting “that” or “who” after the emphasized element
3. Participle Phrases for Conciseness
Formula: Present/Past Participle + modifiers, Main Clause
Example from Band 8-9 Essay:
“When used as a complement to traditional teaching methods rather than a substitute, technology can genuinely enhance educational outcomes.”
Why It Scores Well: Reduces wordiness by converting clauses into phrases. Shows advanced grammatical control and stylistic maturity.
Additional Examples:
- “Having analyzed extensive research on digital learning, educators increasingly recognize the importance of blended approaches.”
- “Implemented thoughtfully, educational technology bridges gaps between privileged and disadvantaged students.”
- “Lacking proper guidance, students often develop superficial learning habits when using digital resources.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Creating dangling modifiers (participle phrase doesn’t clearly refer to subject)
- Overusing participle phrases consecutively
- Using incorrect participle form (confusing present and past participles)
4. Non-Defining Relative Clauses for Additional Information
Formula: Main Clause, which/who + additional information, continuation
Example from Band 8-9 Essay:
“Interactive simulations in subjects like chemistry and physics enable students to conduct virtual experiments that would be prohibitively expensive or dangerous in physical laboratories, thereby enhancing conceptual understanding through experiential learning.”
Why It Scores Well: Adds sophisticated detail while maintaining sentence flow. Demonstrates ability to create complex yet clear sentences.
Additional Examples:
- “Online learning platforms, which offer courses from prestigious universities worldwide, have transformed access to higher education.”
- “Educational software, which adapts to individual learning speeds and styles, provides personalization impossible in traditional classrooms.”
- “Digital literacy, which encompasses critical evaluation of online information, has become as fundamental as traditional literacy skills.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Confusing defining and non-defining relative clauses
- Forgetting commas around non-defining clauses
- Overloading sentences with multiple relative clauses
5. Advanced Conditional Structures
Formula: Should/Were/Had + Subject + Verb, Subject + would/could + Verb
Example from Band 8-9 Essay:
“Should educators fail to design activities that require analysis, synthesis, and evaluation, students may develop superficial learning approaches.”
Why It Scores Well: Shows mastery of complex grammar that goes beyond basic conditionals. Demonstrates formal academic style.
Additional Examples:
- “Were schools to invest solely in technology without teacher training, the educational benefits would remain unrealized.”
- “Had educational institutions integrated technology more gradually, resistance from traditional educators might have been reduced.”
- “Should technology continue advancing at current rates, future pedagogical approaches will require continuous adaptation.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Incorrect inversion order (should/were/had must come first)
- Mixing conditional types inappropriately
- Using these structures too frequently, creating overly formal tone
6. Concessive Clauses for Balanced Arguments
Formula: Although/While/Despite + Subordinate Clause, Main Clause
Example from Band 8-9 Essay:
“Although both perspectives merit consideration, I believe the benefits of educational technology substantially outweigh its drawbacks when implemented thoughtfully.”
Why It Scores Well: Demonstrates nuanced thinking and ability to acknowledge counterarguments. Essential for discussion essays requiring balanced perspectives.
Additional Examples:
- “While concerns about intellectual dependency warrant attention, the democratizing potential of educational technology makes it invaluable.”
- “Despite legitimate worries about screen time’s impact, the accessibility benefits of digital learning cannot be dismissed.”
- “Notwithstanding the challenges of technological dependence, properly guided digital education fosters rather than hinders critical thinking.”
Common Mistakes to Avoid:
- Using “despite” with a clause instead of a noun phrase
- Forgetting the comma between subordinate and main clauses
- Creating logical contradictions between the two clauses
Understanding how digital tools affect broader access to learning opportunities, examining the role of technology in improving education access reveals critical insights about overcoming traditional barriers to quality education.
Self-Assessment Checklist
Before Writing (5 minutes)
Task Analysis:
- [ ] Have I identified the exact question type (discussion, opinion, advantages/disadvantages)?
- [ ] Do I understand all key terms in the question?
- [ ] Have I planned which view I’ll present first and which second?
- [ ] Is my opinion clear in my mind before I start writing?
- [ ] Have I brainstormed 2-3 specific examples for each viewpoint?
Strategic Planning:
- [ ] Do I have a clear 4-paragraph structure planned?
- [ ] Have I allocated roughly equal word counts to both viewpoints?
- [ ] Do I know where my opinion will be stated most strongly?
- [ ] Have I identified 3-4 advanced vocabulary items to include?
- [ ] Have I planned at least 2 complex sentence structures to use?
While Writing (35 minutes)
Task Response:
- [ ] Am I directly answering the question asked?
- [ ] Have I discussed BOTH views as required?
- [ ] Are my examples specific rather than generic?
- [ ] Is my opinion clear and consistently maintained?
- [ ] Am I developing ideas fully with explanation and consequences?
Language Quality:
- [ ] Am I using topic-specific vocabulary rather than basic words?
- [ ] Have I varied my sentence structures (simple, compound, complex)?
- [ ] Am I using cohesive devices naturally, not mechanically?
- [ ] Are my verb tenses consistent and correct?
- [ ] Am I avoiding repetition of the same words/phrases?
Organization:
- [ ] Does each paragraph have one clear main idea?
- [ ] Have I used topic sentences to introduce each paragraph?
- [ ] Do my ideas progress logically from one to the next?
- [ ] Am I using appropriate linking words between and within paragraphs?
After Writing (5 minutes)
Content Review:
- [ ] Have I written at least 250 words? (Count if uncertain)
- [ ] Does my introduction properly paraphrase the question?
- [ ] Have I addressed all parts of the task equally?
- [ ] Is my conclusion consistent with my body paragraphs?
- [ ] Are all my examples relevant and well-explained?
Grammar and Vocabulary Check:
- [ ] Subject-verb agreement: Do singular subjects have singular verbs?
- [ ] Verb forms: Are all verb tenses and forms correct (especially after modals)?
- [ ] Articles: Have I used a/an/the correctly before nouns?
- [ ] Plurals: Are countable nouns properly pluralized when needed?
- [ ] Word forms: Have I used correct forms (noun/verb/adjective/adverb)?
- [ ] Spelling: Have I checked commonly misspelled words?
Coherence Check:
- [ ] Can I follow my own argument easily when re-reading?
- [ ] Have I avoided over-using the same linking words?
- [ ] Do all pronouns have clear antecedents?
- [ ] Are there any sentences that are unclear or confusing?
Time Management Tips
Minute-by-Minute Breakdown (40 minutes total):
- Minutes 1-5: Analyze question, plan structure, brainstorm examples
- Minutes 6-10: Write introduction (3-4 sentences, clear position)
- Minutes 11-20: Write body paragraph 1 (first viewpoint with examples)
- Minutes 21-30: Write body paragraph 2 (second viewpoint with examples)
- Minutes 31-37: Write conclusion (2-3 sentences summarizing both views and restating opinion)
- Minutes 38-40: Proofread systematically (grammar first, then vocabulary, then coherence)
If Running Out of Time:
- Prioritize completing your conclusion (even if brief) over perfecting body paragraphs
- Write shorter, error-free sentences rather than incomplete complex ones
- Focus on Task Response (answering the question fully) over advanced vocabulary
- Ensure you reach 250 words minimum, even if grammar isn’t perfect
Practice Time Management:
- Use a timer during practice sessions
- Track where you spend most time (usually body paragraphs)
- Practice writing introductions and conclusions in under 5 minutes each
- Build speed through regular timed practice (3-4 times per week)
Conclusion
Mastering IELTS Writing Task 2 essays on the role of technology in education requires understanding not just what to write, but how to express ideas with appropriate sophistication for your target band score. The three sample essays demonstrated clearly that the difference between Band 6 and Band 8 lies not in topic knowledge alone, but in grammatical accuracy, vocabulary precision, idea development depth, and organizational coherence.
The path from Band 6 to Band 7 centers on eliminating systematic grammar errors, particularly subject-verb agreement and verb forms after modals, while expanding your active vocabulary beyond basic terms. Moving from Band 7 to Band 8-9 requires mastering complex sentence structures, deploying academic collocations naturally, and presenting nuanced arguments with specific, relevant examples that demonstrate real-world awareness.
For broader insights into institutional changes driven by digital learning tools, exploring the role of technology in public education offers valuable perspectives on system-wide implementation challenges and opportunities.
Your Action Plan:
- Week 1-2: Focus on eliminating basic grammar errors using the mistake correction table above
- Week 3-4: Build vocabulary by learning 3-5 academic collocations daily from the essential vocabulary list
- Week 5-6: Practice incorporating one new complex sentence structure per essay
- Week 7-8: Write full timed essays (40 minutes) and self-assess using the checklists provided
Remember that improvement follows consistent practice rather than intensive cramming. Writing just three essays per week with systematic self-correction will yield better results than writing ten essays without reflection. Analyze your recurring mistakes, target specific weaknesses, and gradually incorporate more sophisticated structures as basic accuracy becomes automatic.
Realistic Timeline Expectations:
- Band 5 to Band 6: 2-3 months with focused grammar correction
- Band 6 to Band 7: 3-4 months developing vocabulary and reducing errors
- Band 7 to Band 8: 4-6 months mastering complex structures and argumentation
- Band 8 to Band 9: 6+ months refining precision and sophistication
Share your practice essays in the comments below for community feedback, and feel free to ask specific questions about any aspect of IELTS Writing Task 2. Fellow learners’ perspectives often provide valuable insights that complement formal instruction. What specific challenges are you facing in your IELTS Writing preparation? Your questions help create better resources for the entire learning community.