Animal welfare laws and regulations have become increasingly prevalent in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions over the past few years. Based on analysis of recent exam patterns, this topic appears in approximately 15% of tests, particularly in questions about government legislation and social responsibility. Let’s examine a commonly tested question format on this subject.
Should governments implement stricter laws on animal rights?
Some people believe that governments should enforce stricter regulations to protect animal welfare, while others think current laws are sufficient. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Essay Analysis
This question requires candidates to:
- Discuss arguments for and against stricter animal welfare laws
- Present a balanced analysis of both perspectives
- Provide a clear personal stance
- Support arguments with relevant examples
Band 9 Sample Essay
As debates about animal rights intensify globally, the adequacy of existing animal protection legislation has become a contentious issue. While some advocate for more stringent regulations, others maintain that current laws sufficiently safeguard animal welfare. In my view, there is a compelling need for stronger legal frameworks to ensure comprehensive animal protection.
Proponents of stricter regulations argue that existing laws often fail to prevent animal cruelty and exploitation. For instance, in many countries, industrial farming practices continue to subject animals to severe distress despite basic welfare guidelines. Furthermore, penalties for animal abuse are frequently too lenient to serve as effective deterrents. Should governments impose stricter laws on animal cruelty, violators would face more serious consequences, potentially reducing incidents of mistreatment.
Conversely, those satisfied with current regulations contend that additional laws could burden legitimate businesses and traditional practices. They argue that existing frameworks already provide adequate protection while maintaining a balance between animal welfare and human needs. For example, many countries have comprehensive regulations governing laboratory animal testing, ensuring both scientific progress and ethical treatment.
Nevertheless, I believe strengthening animal welfare laws is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, scientific research increasingly demonstrates animals’ capacity for suffering, suggesting our moral obligation to enhance their protection. Secondly, stricter regulations often drive innovation in animal-friendly practices, benefiting both animals and businesses long-term. Finally, robust animal welfare laws reflect a society’s ethical evolution and commitment to protecting vulnerable beings.
Should endangered species be protected by law, as evidence shows that comprehensive legal frameworks can significantly improve animal welfare while fostering a more compassionate society.
Vocabulary Analysis
- contentious (adj.) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing or likely to cause disagreement
- stringent (adj.) /ˈstrɪndʒənt/ – strict, precise, and exacting
- deterrent (n.) /dɪˈterənt/ – something that discourages action
- comprehensive (adj.) /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/ – complete; including all aspects
- legitimate (adj.) /lɪˈdʒɪtɪmət/ – conforming to the law or rules
Key Advanced Structures
-
Complex sentence with concession:
“While some advocate for more stringent regulations, others maintain that current laws sufficiently safeguard animal welfare.” -
Conditional structure:
“Should governments impose stricter laws, violators would face more serious consequences.” -
Parallel structure:
“…ensuring both scientific progress and ethical treatment.”
Remember to practice writing your own response to this question in the comments below. Focus on clear organization, balanced arguments, and appropriate use of advanced vocabulary and grammatical structures.