Freedom of speech has been a recurring topic in IELTS Writing Task 2, appearing approximately 4-5 times annually in recent years. Based on analysis of past exam papers and importance of free speech in a democracy, this theme is likely to remain prominent in future tests. Let’s examine one frequently tested question:
Some people believe that freedom of speech should be unrestricted on social media platforms. Others think strict regulations are necessary. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analysis of Question Requirements
- Topic: Social media and freedom of speech
- Task: Discuss both perspectives and provide personal view
- Key elements: Freedom of speech, social media regulations, impacts on society
The complex debate between unrestricted speech and regulation on social media platforms
Band 9 Sample Essay
As the debate over should free speech on social media be unrestricted intensifies, this complex issue requires careful consideration of both perspectives.
Those advocating unrestricted freedom of expression argue that it is fundamental to democratic societies. They contend that any form of censorship could lead to suppression of legitimate voices and stifle innovation. Furthermore, they believe that users should have the autonomy to express themselves without interference.
However, proponents of regulation emphasize the importance of regulating social media content to prevent harmful consequences. They point to instances of cyberbullying, hate speech, and misinformation that can damage individuals and society. Moreover, they argue that completely unrestricted speech could undermine social stability and public safety.
In my opinion, while freedom of expression is crucial, reasonable regulations are necessary to protect vulnerable individuals and maintain social harmony. A balanced approach that preserves core expressive rights while preventing harmful content would be most effective. This could involve transparent content moderation policies and appeal mechanisms.
Band 7 Sample Essay
The question of should there be a limit to freedom of speech on social media has become increasingly important in recent years.
Supporters of unlimited freedom of speech believe it is essential for democracy. They think that people should be able to express their opinions freely on social media platforms. Additionally, they argue that restrictions might be used to silence important voices.
On the other hand, those who support regulations argue that some control is needed. They point out that unrestricted speech can lead to cyberbullying and the spread of false information. They also believe that social media companies should be responsible for protecting users from harmful content.
In my view, some regulation is necessary but it should not be too strict. While freedom of speech is important, we need to protect people from harmful content. The best solution would be to have clear rules that prevent abuse while still allowing people to express their opinions.
Key Vocabulary
- Autonomy (n) /ɔːˈtɒnəmi/ – freedom to act independently
- Cyberbullying (n) /ˈsaɪbəˌbʊliɪŋ/ – online harassment
- Misinformation (n) /ˌmɪsɪnfəˈmeɪʃn/ – false information
- Contentious (adj) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing disagreement
- Fundamental (adj) /ˌfʌndəˈmentl/ – basic and essential
Content moderation process on social media platforms showing balance between freedom and safety
Conclusion
Similar topics likely to appear in future tests include:
- Role of social media in democratic societies
- Balance between online freedom and responsibility
- Digital rights and regulations
Practice writing your own essay on this topic and share in the comments for community feedback and improvement.
