Environmental topics, particularly chemical pollution, frequently appear in IELTS Writing Task 2. Based on analysis of past exam patterns and expert predictions, this topic has appeared in approximately 15% of recent tests and is likely to remain relevant due to growing global environmental concerns.
For today’s analysis, we’ll focus on this commonly encountered question type:
Some people believe that governments should focus on reducing industrial chemical pollution, while others think changing individual behavior is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Industrial chemical pollution versus individual environmental behavior
Question Analysis
This is a discussion + opinion essay that requires:
- Examining both perspectives on tackling chemical pollution
- Providing a clear personal stance
- Supporting arguments with relevant examples
- Maintaining a balanced discussion
Let’s look at sample essays for different band scores.
Band 8-9 Sample Essay
The challenges of reducing water pollution present a complex issue that requires action at both governmental and individual levels. While some advocate for stricter industrial regulations, others emphasize personal responsibility. In my view, both approaches are essential but government intervention holds greater potential for significant impact.
Industrial pollution control through government action is crucial for several reasons. Firstly, industries are responsible for the majority of chemical emissions, releasing vast quantities of harmful substances into our environment. For instance, textile factories in developing countries often discharge untreated chemicals directly into water bodies, causing widespread contamination. Additionally, governments possess the authority to implement and enforce regulations, impose fines, and mandate cleaner technologies.
Regarding individual behavior change, proponents argue that collective personal actions can create substantial impact. When millions of people modify their consumption patterns, reduce chemical-based product usage, and properly dispose of hazardous materials, the cumulative effect becomes significant. Should companies be held accountable for environmental pollution, individuals can influence corporate behavior through conscious consumer choices.
However, I believe government intervention is more crucial because individual actions, while valuable, cannot match the scale of industrial pollution reduction. Furthermore, without proper regulatory frameworks, even the most environmentally conscious individuals cannot prevent corporate negligence. Benefits of renewable energy in reducing pollution demonstrate how government policies can drive systemic change more effectively than individual initiatives.
In conclusion, while both approaches have merit, government-led initiatives targeting industrial pollution should take precedence, supported by ongoing efforts to promote individual environmental responsibility.
